ERP

Financial Management

Human Capital Management

Human Resources

School Management

Higher Education ERP: How Colleges Choose Finance, HR and Student Systems

Sherman Hsieh

Share This Post!

Last updated: October 8, 2026 · Independent buyer’s guide · We do not sell rankings or coverage.

A higher education ERP is the set of administrative systems a college runs on: the general ledger and budgeting, payroll and HR, the student information system (SIS) that holds admissions, registration and academic records, and the financial aid and student billing processes that sit between them. Some institutions buy all four from one vendor such as Workday, Oracle, Ellucian or Jenzabar, while others pair a student system with a separate finance and HR platform. The right choice depends on your enrollment, IT staffing, GASB or FASB reporting basis, and how many years of project work your campus can absorb.

What a higher education ERP covers

A college’s core cycle runs from application and admission through aid packaging, registration, billing and aid disbursement to graduation or withdrawal. In practice, a higher-ed ERP is four connected domains:

• Finance: general ledger, budgeting, grants and sponsored projects, procurement, accounts payable, capital assets and endowment or restricted fund tracking.
• HR and payroll: faculty and staff records, position control, faculty contracts and load, benefits, payroll and federal work-study.
• Student information: admissions, course catalog and scheduling, registration, degree audit, grades, transcripts and IPEDS reporting.
• Student financial aid and accounts: ISIR processing, packaging, disbursement, student billing and payment plans, and federal reporting.

Financial aid is where higher education departs most from other industries. Under 34 CFR 668.22, a student who completes more than 60% of a payment period has earned all of the aid, and the institution must return unearned funds no later than 45 days after it determines the student withdrew (eCFR, current as of October 5, 2026). Title IV records generally must be kept for three years after the end of the relevant award year (eCFR, current as of October 1, 2026). These calculations need registration, billing and aid data together, so aid rarely works well as a fully separate product.

Where higher-ed ERP projects go wrong

The most common problem is underestimating duration. Hamilton College’s Workday Student plan starts pre-planning in February 2025 and finishes deployment in September 2027 (Hamilton College, no date shown). Endicott College launched its Workday project in summer 2022, went live on finance, payroll and HCM in June 2023, and completed its full Workday Student launch in March 2025 (Endicott College, no date shown).

The second problem is the academic calendar. Student go-lives must align with admissions cycles and term starts. Xavier University’s Workday Student plan runs from September 2026 to August 2027 for a Fall 2027 go-live, with all dates marked preliminary (Xavier University, no date shown). A slip of a few weeks can become a slip of a full term.

The third problem is scope creep across a system. The North Carolina Community College System’s move to Ellucian Banner SaaS covers 58 colleges and the system office and has faced missed contract dates, with a five-college pilot running through fall 2031 (EdNC, May 19, 2025). Our ERP implementation cost guide covers the budget mechanics behind overruns.

Suite or best-of-breed?

A suite gives you one data model across student, finance and HR. That matters where domains meet: a withdrawal triggers an aid recalculation, which changes a student balance, which posts to the ledger. With separate products, those handoffs become integrations you build and maintain.

Best-of-breed lets you replace the oldest or weakest system first and keep what works. A common pattern is to move finance and HR to the cloud while keeping a stable SIS. Unit4, for example, sells finance, procurement and HR to colleges and describes integrating with existing student systems (Unit4, no date shown). Our broader comparison of ERP versus best-of-breed software covers the general trade-offs.

For a small college, staffing often decides it. With two or three people in administrative IT, every integration is a long-term obligation. A suite reduces that work but ties you to one vendor’s roadmap and renewal pricing.

The main vendors and where they typically fit

Workday

Workday sells Financial Management, HCM and Workday Student as one cloud platform. Workday says more than 650 higher education institutions in 19 countries have selected it, and 85 are live on Workday Student, which launched in 2018 (Workday, October 15, 2025). The gap shows that many campuses run Workday finance and HR alongside another student system. Named customers include Macalester, Swarthmore and Centre colleges. Workday does not publish pricing.

Oracle

Oracle offers Fusion Cloud ERP and HCM, PeopleSoft Campus Solutions and the newer Oracle Student. Premier Support for PeopleSoft Continuous Innovation releases runs through at least 2037 (Oracle, updated February 19, 2026). Quest Oracle Community reports that the first Oracle Student institutions go live in Fall 2027 (Quest Oracle Community, updated June 16, 2026). In our view Oracle suits larger universities and state systems best; a small college choosing Oracle Student now would be an early adopter.

Ellucian

Ellucian sells Banner, typically found at larger public institutions, and Colleague, typically found at private and community colleges, under its Ellucian Student, Finance, HCM and Student Aid products. Its product page quotes a customer who “implemented [Ellucian Student] Colleague SaaS in just nine months” (Ellucian, no date shown). Treat that as a best case. McLennan Community College’s Colleague cloud migration, under a six-year, $5,919,543 contract approved on September 30, 2024, runs from January 2026 to a planned December 2027 production migration (McLennan Community College, updated August 10, 2026).

Anthology (now part of Ellucian)

Ellucian completed its acquisition of Anthology’s SIS and ERP business on December 31, 2025, adding more than 260 customers, and says it will continue to maintain the existing systems (Ellucian, January 5, 2026). Anthology Finance & HCM is built on Microsoft Dynamics 365 for Finance and Operations and covers student accounts, work-study, IPEDS reporting, grants, procurement and payroll (Anthology help, Ellucian, updated August 21, 2026).

Jenzabar

Jenzabar One is a cloud platform that combines Jenzabar Student, Finance, HCM, Financial Aid and Advancement (Jenzabar, no date shown). It typically suits small private and community colleges that want one higher-ed vendor. Rogue Community College, a public college in Oregon, had its Jenzabar One contract approved in June 2022 and originally planned an 18-month implementation toward an August 2024 go-live (Rogue Community College, no date shown). Jenzabar does not publish pricing.

Other options for small institutions

Populi is one of the few vendors that publishes a price: $199 per month plus $9 per month per billable student, including implementation and training, month to month (Populi, checked October 8, 2026). It covers SIS, financial aid and student accounts receivable, but its pricing page lists no general ledger, so you would pair it with an accounting system such as those in our nonprofit accounting software guide.

At-a-glance comparison

What higher-ed ERP costs

Workday, Oracle, Ellucian, Jenzabar and Unit4 publish no list prices on the pages we reviewed. Public institutions, which approve large contracts in open meetings, provide the best evidence. The University of the District of Columbia’s board approved a five-year SaaS contract with Ellucian for its Banner ERP totaling $10,157,746 on July 28, 2026, subject to District Council approval (UDC Board of Trustees, July 28, 2026). McLennan Community College’s six-year Ellucian contract for its Colleague cloud migration is $5,919,543.

Those are contract amounts, not your full cost. Budget separately for partner fees, staff backfill, data cleanup and integrations with your LMS, CRM and fundraising system. Peer colleges’ board minutes are the best place to find comparable contracts.

GASB vs FASB: why your reporting basis matters

Public colleges follow the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. GASB Statement No. 35, issued in November 1999, brought public colleges and universities under the GASB 34 reporting model, with a statement of net assets, an operating statement, a cash flow statement and MD&A (Illinois Community College Board, no date shown). The Texas Comptroller notes that universities report as business-type activities and that, because GASB 35 superseded GASB 15, the old NACUBO fund structure is no longer applicable as a reporting model (Texas Comptroller, no date shown).

GASB 103, effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2025, changes that operating statement. It adds an “operating income (loss) and noncapital subsidies” subtotal, presents state appropriations as nonoperating subsidies, and requires unusual or infrequent items to be shown separately (JMCo, a CPA firm, originally published August 13, 2025). For a June 30 year-end, that means fiscal 2026. Ask each vendor to produce a GASB 103 statement from standard reporting.

Private nonprofit colleges follow FASB. ASU 2016-14 collapsed net assets into two classes, with and without donor restrictions, and requires liquidity disclosures and an analysis of expenses by both nature and function (Journal of Accountancy, February 1, 2019). Your ERP must track donor restrictions and functional allocations at the transaction level, or your controller will rebuild them in spreadsheets.

How the ERP contract itself is accounted for

The ERP subscription itself is accounted for differently by basis. Public colleges apply GASB 96, which records a right-to-use subscription asset and a liability at the present value of expected payments, with capitalizable implementation costs added to the asset (Baker Tilly, June 29, 2020). It took effect for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2022. Private colleges apply ASU 2018-15, which capitalizes application development costs of a cloud service contract and expenses them over the hosting term, while data conversion and training are expensed as incurred (Moss Adams, no date shown).

Illustrative example: the same contract under GASB and FASB

This example is an illustration with assumed numbers, not vendor pricing. Suppose a college signs a five-year ERP subscription at $300,000 per year, paid at the end of each year, and spends $600,000 on implementation work that qualifies for capitalization. Assume a 4% discount rate.

Public college (GASB 96): the subscription liability is the present value of five $300,000 payments at 4%, or $1,335,547. The subscription asset is $1,335,547 plus $600,000 of implementation, or $1,935,547. Straight-line amortization over five years is $387,109 per year, plus year-one interest of $53,422, for about $440,531 of year-one expense.

Private college (ASU 2018-15): the $300,000 subscription is an operating expense each year. The $600,000 of capitalized implementation is amortized over the five-year term at $120,000 per year, for $420,000 of year-one expense and no subscription liability on the balance sheet.

The cash is identical, but the statements differ, so ask finance to model a multi-year term before you sign.

Three buyer scenarios

A public community college of 6,000 students on an aging on-premises SIS. You report under GASB with a small IT team. Shortlist Ellucian SaaS and Jenzabar One, ask each for public-sector references of similar size, and budget for GASB 96 treatment of the subscription.

A private liberal arts college of 2,000 students with a stable SIS but outdated finance and HR. You report under FASB and need donor-restriction tracking. Consider replacing finance and HR first with Workday or Ellucian, and schedule the student system as a second phase.

A seminary or very small college under 500 students. A full suite will likely cost more than it saves. A published-price SIS such as Populi plus nonprofit accounting software can cover the essentials, including financial aid.

When you do not need a new ERP

You may not need a replacement if your current vendor still supports your version, your auditors have no system-related findings and your registrar and aid office can close terms on time. Moving to your vendor’s SaaS edition, as McLennan is doing with Colleague, removes infrastructure work without retraining every office. Oracle’s PeopleSoft support through at least 2037 gives Campus Solutions customers time. End of support, audit findings or processes configuration cannot fix justify a new ERP; age alone does not.

How we researched this

We reviewed the top-ranking pages for “higher education ERP”, which offered vendor rankings with unsourced cost and timeline ranges and no GASB versus FASB comparison. We then read vendor pages, timelines published by five colleges, board contract documents, the eCFR and CPA firm guidance, which we label as such.

Related guides

• Higher Education Fundraising Software: 2026 Buyer’s Guide
• Single Audit Requirements: $1M Threshold and Major Programs
• GAAP vs GASB: Governments, Public Colleges and Nonprofits

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between a higher education ERP and an SIS?

An SIS manages student records, registration, grades and transcripts. A higher education ERP usually means the full administrative stack, including finance, HR, payroll and financial aid alongside the SIS. Some vendors sell all of these as one suite; others sell only finance and HR.

How long does a college ERP implementation take?

Published campus timelines mostly fall between 18 and 33 months. Rogue Community College planned 18 months for Jenzabar One, and Endicott College went from project launch in summer 2022 to full Workday Student go-live in March 2025. Student modules take longest because they follow the academic calendar.

Do public and private colleges need different ERP features?

Yes. Public colleges report under GASB, including the new GASB 103 statement format and GASB 96 subscription accounting. Private nonprofit colleges report under FASB, which requires tracking net assets with and without donor restrictions and functional expense allocation. Ask vendors to demonstrate standard reports for your basis.

How much does a higher education ERP cost?

Most vendors do not publish pricing. Public contract records give a reference point: the University of the District of Columbia approved a five-year Ellucian Banner SaaS contract for $10,157,746 in July 2026. Very small colleges can find published pricing from vendors such as Populi, which charges $199 per month plus $9 per student per month.

Sources

• eCFR, 34 CFR 668.22, Treatment of Title IV funds when a student withdraws, current as of October 5, 2026. ecfr.gov
• eCFR, 34 CFR 668.24, Record retention and examinations, current as of October 1, 2026. ecfr.gov
• Hamilton College, Workday Student phased rollout, no date shown. hamilton.edu
• Endicott College, Workday project page, no date shown. endicott.edu
• Xavier University, Workday Student project timeline, no date shown. xavier.edu
• EdNC, State Board of Community Colleges discusses ERP modernization, May 19, 2025. ednc.org
• Unit4, Higher education ERP software (vendor), no date shown. unit4.com
• Workday, Higher education momentum press release (vendor), October 15, 2025. newsroom.workday.com
• Oracle, PeopleSoft Premier Support (vendor), updated February 19, 2026. oracle.com
• Quest Oracle Community, How Oracle is evolving PeopleSoft Campus Solutions, updated June 16, 2026. questoraclecommunity.org
• Ellucian, Ellucian Student product page (vendor), no date shown. ellucian.com
• Ellucian, Ellucian completes acquisition of Anthology’s SIS and ERP business (vendor), January 5, 2026. ellucian.com
• Anthology Finance & HCM help, About (vendor documentation), updated August 21, 2026. anthology-help.ellucian.com
• McLennan Community College, Colleague modernization project, updated August 10, 2026. mclennan.edu
• Jenzabar, Jenzabar One (vendor), no date shown. jenzabar.com
• Rogue Community College, ERP project FAQ, no date shown. roguecc.edu
• Populi, Pricing (vendor), checked October 8, 2026. populi.co
• University of the District of Columbia Board of Trustees, Resolution No. 2026-23, Ellucian SaaS contract, July 28, 2026. udc.edu
• Illinois Community College Board, GASB Statement No. 35 implementation, no date shown. iccb.org
• Texas Comptroller, Annual financial report requirements for universities, no date shown. fmx.cpa.texas.gov
• JMCo (CPA firm), GASB 103 and 104: what higher education institutions need to know, originally published August 13, 2025. jmco.com
• Journal of Accountancy, NFP financial reporting standard, February 1, 2019. journalofaccountancy.com
• Baker Tilly (CPA firm), GASB issues guidance on cloud computing, June 29, 2020. bakertilly.com
• Moss Adams (CPA firm), Guidance on accounting for cloud computing arrangement implementation costs, no date shown. mossadams.com

6774 Overall Score

Sherman Hsieh

CEO & Editor-in-Chief, Business-Software.com
Independent analysis of enterprise software — ERP, CRM and more

Sherman Hsieh is the founder, CEO, and editor-in-chief of Business-Software.com. He leads the site's independent, buyer-focused coverage of ERP, CRM, and other business systems, including vendor-neutral comparisons, pricing analysis, and implementation guidance. Before founding Business-Software.com, Sherman was an executive at Siebel ...